Michigan Criminal Law Home
  • Home
  • Blog
Visit http://www.nicholslawyers.com to learn more

Welcome to Accused But Not Guilty!


Excellent Result in a Michigan-OWI/DUI-2d Offense: No Jail


Tuesday, May 25, 2010

A Michigan judge imposed a sentence of no jail time for a citizen charged in southwest Michigan with OWI 2d.

Continue reading article


Providing a Place to Smoke Medical Marijuana is Risky


Thursday, April 08, 2010

One of the more controversial statutes enacted in the recent past is Michigan’s Medical Marihuana Act (the statute spells “marijuana” with an “h” as opposed to a “j”).  The statute provides clear guidance on who is protected:  “A qualifying patient who has been issued and possesses a registry identification card shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or penalty”, so long as that qualifying patient does not possess more than 2.5 ounces and 12 plants (MCL 333.26424(a)). 

Continue reading article


Facing Multiple Felony Drug Charges - Client Walks Away with a Chance at a Clean Record


Monday, March 29, 2010

We recently managed to dodge a federal indictment for a client and negotiated an outstanding plea for her in state court. What is difficult to understand is that the best lawyering at the federal level comes before the indictment is formally issued.

Continue reading article


The Judge will not Grant Bond for Me in My Michigan-Criminal-Case. What Do I Do?


Monday, March 15, 2010

The provision used by the district judge was MCR 6.106(B). Pursuant to MCR 6.106(B)(4), the arraigning magistrate must specifically state the reasons for denying pretrial release. Here, there were no specific reasons stated, other than a reference to the charges against the accused.

Continue reading article


Just Say "NO" to Taking a PBT


Friday, March 05, 2010

Law enforcement can no longer require someone to take a preliminary breath test (pbt) in the State of Michigan when investigating a potential violation of the minor in possession (MIP) statute. In People v Chowdury, 285 Mich App 509 (2009), the Court of Appeals adopted prior rulings in 2 cases by a federal judge in Bay City. That ruling held that the administration of a pbt is a search for purposes of the 4th Amendment. The ruling also held that a police officer must have either a search warrant or an exigent circumstance in order to require a citizen to submit to a pbt.

Continue reading article


View Previous Posts
The information contained in this web site is neither legal advice nor is it intended to be legal advice. The information contained in this web site is general information designed to give the reader a basic understanding of some legal concepts about what we do in these areas.
Login